The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MKTW · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FLEX | MKTW | ENS | LIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 | 62 (highest) | 61 | 61 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 61 | 43 | 81 (highest) | 80 |
| Pricing power | 16 | 83 | 38 | 95 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 73 (highest) | — | 47 | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 56 | 100 (highest) | 54 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 100 (highest) | 20 | 86 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 188% above high estimate | No price data | 41% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $43.3B | Not reported | $7.0B | $3.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |