The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FLO · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ADM · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | FLO | BGS | SENEA | ADM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 21 | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 21 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 19 | 34 | 10 |
| Pricing power | — | 27 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 17 (highest) | 0 | 10 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 1 | 40 (highest) | 19 | 24 |
| Capital allocation | 17 | 24 | 45 | 50 (highest) |
| 29% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 114% above value if growth stopped today | 37% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.6B | $281M | $1.2B | $41.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |