The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

FMC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WSTRF · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FTCO · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SUIC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureFMCWSTRFFTCOSUIC
Moat Score (0–100)39 (highest)39 (highest)39 (highest)39 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend1550 (highest)1520
Pricing power64686580 (highest)
Returns on capital32 (highest)012
Balance-sheet safety285578 (highest)40
Capital discipline57 (highest)24044
Price vs. high estimate83% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)No price data36% below high estimateNo price data
Market cap$1.4B$25.5M$114M$1.2M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025