The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

FUST · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MERC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MOS · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

UUUU · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureFUSTMERCMOSUUUU
Moat Score (0–100)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)27
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend0322950 (highest)
Pricing power87 (highest)035
Returns on capital016 (highest)70
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)2328 (highest)
Capital allocation243781 (highest)24
No price data203% above value if growth stopped today45% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$1.2M$44.9M$7.1B$2.7B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025