The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GEO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GEO | GLGI | INGM | CVV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) | 30 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 (highest) | 10 | 32 | 55 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 28 (highest) | 11 |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 62 (highest) | 31 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 40 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 31 | 52 (highest) | 20 | 25 |
| 113% above value if growth stopped today | 86% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 51% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.8B | $7.1M | $6.3B | $25.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |