The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ALK · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GFF | JTAI | ARTW | ALK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 | 29 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 35 | 61 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | 34 (highest) | 0 | 18 | — |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 0 | 0 | 18 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 23 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 56 (highest) | 53 | 38 | 33 |
| 399% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 55% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $4.3B | $7.4M | Not reported | $4.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |