The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

GHC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FFLO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BNED · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SVV · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureGHCFFLOBNEDSVV
Moat Score (0–100)4445 (highest)45 (highest)44
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend67 (highest)—5752
Pricing power—63 (highest)3449
Returns on capital00062 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety3155100 (highest)58
Capital allocation80 (highest)60311
43% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)509% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data165% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$5.3B$10.5M$444M$1.6B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2026FY2025