The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LIND · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
SLGN · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GLW | LIND | DINO | SLGN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 | 70 (highest) | 50 | 48 |
| Pricing power | 54 (highest) | 46 | 27 | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 17 | 21 (highest) | 21 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 41 | 48 (highest) | 47 | — |
| Capital allocation | 35 | 24 | 60 | 65 (highest) |
| 795% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 66% above value if growth stopped today | 8% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $130.8B | $1.4B | $19.2B | $4.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |