The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UAL · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CCK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GNRC | UAL | HUBG | CCK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 85 (highest) | 66 | 54 |
| Pricing power | 60 (highest) | — | 17 | — |
| Returns on capital | 74 (highest) | 44 | 30 | 52 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 34 | 31 | 67 (highest) | 24 |
| Capital allocation | 55 | 48 | 80 (highest) | 76 |
| No price data | 7% above value if growth stopped today | 100% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 148% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $31.1B | $1.6M | $12.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |