The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GPC · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GPC | CRCT | SCIA | SXI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 15 | 61 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 56 | 47 | 27 | 61 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 95 | 93 | 31 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 73 | 100 (highest) | 46 |
| Capital allocation | 35 | 76 | 24 | 86 (highest) |
| 80% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 95% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 255% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $18.4B | $1.4B | Not reported | $3.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |