The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GRBK · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DTI · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GRBK | DTI | NUS | KMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) | 63 (highest) | 62 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 44 | 20 | 73 |
| Pricing power | 33 | 100 (highest) | 98 | 46 |
| Returns on capital | 24 | 88 (highest) | 75 | 24 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | — | 62 | 78 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 20 | 61 | 91 |
| 19% below value if growth stopped today | 36% below value if growth stopped today | 81% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 34% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.6B | $66.3M | $247M | $2.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |