The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GXAI · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GSIT | THRY | GXAI | FIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 20 | 70 (highest) | 61 |
| Pricing power | 86 | 98 (highest) | — | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 29 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 20 | 55 (highest) | 14 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 20 | 24 | 50 (highest) |
| No price data | 104% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 9% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $206M | $167M | $7.6M | $21.4B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |