The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ATDS · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GTLB | RBA | ATDS | FROG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 95 (highest) | 57 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 32 | 79 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 41 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 32 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | 385% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $5.2B | $20.7B | $109357 | $9.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |