The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GTLL | FATN | SNPS | OSIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 63 | 47 | 95 (highest) | 92 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 61 |
| Returns on capital | — | 76 (highest) | 66 | 40 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 72 | 0 | 37 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 26 | 60 | 92 (highest) |
| No price data | 25% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 491% above value if growth stopped today | 88% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $70.1M | $84.6B | $3.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |