The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ANKM · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GTM | AMKR | TWLO | ANKM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 64 | 44 | 80 (highest) | 70 |
| Pricing power | 97 (highest) | 23 | 84 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 83 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 65 | 88 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 62 | 24 | 24 |
| 23% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 149% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $10.3B | $37.2B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |