The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

GXAI · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FTNT · Technology · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

META · Technology · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

IBEX · Technology · Wide moat

Wide moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureGXAIFTNTMETAIBEX
Moat Score (0–100)37100 (highest)9899
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend70100 (highest)9594
Pricing power100 (highest)100 (highest)
Returns on capital0100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55100 (highest)97100 (highest)
Capital allocation24100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)
No price data889% above value if growth stopped today292% above value if growth stopped today31% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$4.3M$126.2B$1.71T$535M
Moat tierNo moatWide moatWide moatWide moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026