The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HCWC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
NSIT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | HCWC | F | NSIT | STRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 57 | 19 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 66 (highest) | 10 | 15 | 10 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 72 (highest) | 58 | 22 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 29 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 89 (highest) | 60 |
| No price data | No price data | 17% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 35% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $3.6M | Not reported | $3.6B | $346M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |