The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLMH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
KTB · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | HD | BLMH | KTB | ELA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 85 | 73 | 90 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 59 | 64 | 69 (highest) | 28 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 92 | 93 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 41 | 96 (highest) | 27 | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 79 (highest) | 24 | 74 | 51 |
| 75% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 36% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 177% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $294.3B | $2.7M | $3.8B | $309M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |