The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AAMI · Other · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OPY · Other · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | HKHC | AAMI | OPY | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 | 64 (highest) | 63 | 55 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 | 39 | 59 | 82 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 43 | — | — | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 100 (highest) | 28 | 16 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 36 | 100 (highest) | 19 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 80 (highest) | 64 | 60 |
| No price data | 69% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 46% above value if growth stopped today | 320% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $522M | $2.9B | $1.2B | $52.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |