The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

HTO · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AES · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

XEL · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SR · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureHTOAESXELSR
Moat Score (0–100)3637 (highest)3636
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend98 (highest)6054
Pricing power31100 (highest)80
Returns on capital03 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety128 (highest)01
Capital allocation45 (highest)284143
144% above value if growth stopped today282% above value if growth stopped today159% above value if growth stopped today76% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$2.3B$10.6B$50.9B$4.9B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025