The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GEO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | INGM | LGIH | GLGI | GEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 | 31 (highest) | 30 | 30 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 32 | 10 | 10 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 28 | 40 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 31 | 42 | 62 (highest) | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 28 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 21 | 52 (highest) | 31 |
| 51% above value if growth stopped today | 55% below value if growth stopped today | 86% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 119% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $6.3B | $995M | $7.1M | $3.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |