The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INTU · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | INTU | ROL | PAYC | JKHY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 90 | 92 (highest) | 91 | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 95 | 92 |
| Pricing power | — | 86 | 100 (highest) | 71 |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 94 | 92 | 73 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 70 | 80 | 89 (highest) | 87 |
| 115% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 180% above value if growth stopped today | 227% above value if growth stopped today | 156% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $81.4B | $15.6B | $12.4B | $10.9B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |