The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SM · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | IOSP | SM | CROX | AMRZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 71 | 75 (highest) | 60 | 71 |
| Pricing power | 46 | 86 (highest) | 84 | 44 |
| Returns on capital | 38 | 43 | 93 (highest) | 86 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 37 | 0 | 33 |
| Capital allocation | 46 | — | 64 | 66 (highest) |
| 62% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 16% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 112% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.1B | $3.8B | $6.8B | $27.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |