The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

IR · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

VTOL · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TKR · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BWEN · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureIRVTOLTKRBWEN
Moat Score (0–100)52 (highest)52 (highest)52 (highest)51
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend7984 (highest)4869
Pricing power62 (highest)480
Returns on capital41030 (highest)7
Balance-sheet safety323234100 (highest)
Capital allocation808098 (highest)80
212% above value if growth stopped today126% above value if growth stopped today119% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$33.0B$1.3B$9.8BNot reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025