The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JANL · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: No debt, cash, or interest-expense disclosures to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JANL | BB | SMTK | DH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 40 | 65 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | 35 | 96 | 52 | 99 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 56 (highest) | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 70 (highest) | 55 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 33 | 5 | 44 (highest) | 29 |
| 638% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $59.3M | $4.5B | $15.4M | $109M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |