The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SWK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SOAR · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JBI | SWK | KLNG | SOAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 | 35 | 52 (highest) | 42 |
| Pricing power | 59 (highest) | 47 | 53 | 1 |
| Returns on capital | 46 | 68 (highest) | 4 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 27 | — | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 30 | 17 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | 163% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $14.1B | Not reported | $1.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |