The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
INTU · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | JKHY | PAYC | INTU | MPWR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 90 | 91 (highest) | 90 | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 92 | 95 | 100 (highest) | 95 |
| Pricing power | 71 | 100 (highest) | — | 93 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 87 | 89 (highest) | 70 | 60 |
| 159% above value if growth stopped today | 266% above value if growth stopped today | 134% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1130% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $11.0B | $13.9B | $88.6B | $59.8B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |