The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KFY · Technology · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BBSI · Technology · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | KFY | EGAN | EXLS | BBSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 80 | 81 (highest) | 80 | 80 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 49 | 55 | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Pricing power | — | 97 (highest) | 60 | 32 |
| Returns on capital | 72 | 100 (highest) | 59 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 89 | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 51 | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| 25% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 201% above value if growth stopped today | 46% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $3.7B | $145M | $6.2B | $820M |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |