The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SWK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KLNG | CHEF | SWK | JBI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 52 | 85 (highest) | 35 | 46 |
| Pricing power | 53 | 43 | 47 | 59 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 5 | 68 (highest) | 46 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 15 | — | 27 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 60 (highest) | 17 | 30 |
| No price data | 904% above value if growth stopped today | 163% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $3.9B | $14.1B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |