The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNIH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
R · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KNIH | FND | G | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 75 | 76 (highest) | 75 | 74 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 56 | 87 (highest) | 80 |
| Pricing power | 96 | 72 | 60 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 18 | 72 | 73 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 64 | 26 |
| Capital allocation | — | 78 | 88 | 92 (highest) |
| No price data | 83% above value if growth stopped today | 6% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 56% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $5.0B | $5.5B | $9.0B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |