The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GEO · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KOSS | LGIH | INGM | GEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 30 | 31 (highest) | 30 | 30 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 10 | 32 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 51 (highest) | 40 | 28 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 42 (highest) | 31 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 40 | 40 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 21 | 20 | 31 (highest) |
| 547% above value if growth stopped today | 37% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 67% above value if growth stopped today | 137% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $35.5M | $1.4B | $6.9B | $4.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |