The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
IQV · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KR | TRN | IQV | LCII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 88 (highest) | 88 (highest) | 36 |
| Pricing power | 42 (highest) | 31 | — | 39 |
| Returns on capital | 44 | 24 | 2 | 47 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 67 (highest) | 40 | 2 | 45 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 58 | 100 (highest) | 72 |
| No price data | No price data | 73% above value if growth stopped today | 12% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $35.3B | $2.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |