The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KTB · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
ATMU · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
BLMH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | KTB | ATMU | BLMH | HD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 73 | 81 | 85 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 69 (highest) | 42 | 64 | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 92 | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 27 | 58 | 96 (highest) | 41 |
| Capital allocation | 74 | 56 | 24 | 79 (highest) |
| 36% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 75% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $3.8B | Not reported | $2.7M | $294.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2026 |