The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RMR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LAD | RMR | ZUMZ | BH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) | 51 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 64 (highest) | 10 | 20 | 39 |
| Pricing power | 24 | — | 57 | 65 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 56 | 100 (highest) | 33 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 9 | 74 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 20 | 44 | 44 |
| 28% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 38% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $8.0B | Not reported | $321M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |