The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LBTYA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SHEN · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

UONE · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NXPL · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureLBTYASHENUONENXPL
Moat Score (0–100)37 (highest)37 (highest)37 (highest)36
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend2060 (highest)1757
Pricing power99100 (highest)100 (highest)26
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety002855 (highest)
Capital allocation64 (highest)243944
82% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)602% above value if growth stopped todayAround the value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$3.3B$627M$23M$157M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025