The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ODFL · Industrials · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LECO | SNA | ODFL | XPEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 81 | 82 (highest) | 82 (highest) | 81 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 89 | 78 | 47 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 59 | 78 (highest) | — | 55 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 64 | 73 | 100 (highest) | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 94 (highest) | 83 | 80 | 80 |
| 159% above value if growth stopped today | 87% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 269% above value if growth stopped today | 110% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $13.8B | $21.0B | $48.6B | $1.2B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |