The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CPNG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LEEN | TSLA | CPNG | PII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 45 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 60 | 80 (highest) | 28 |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 22 | 16 | 38 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 21 | — | 69 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 82 (highest) | 64 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 24 | 64 (highest) |
| No price data | 1652% above value if growth stopped today | 1455% above value if growth stopped today | 41% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $101833 | $1.38T | $26.6B | $2.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |