The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNTM · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LFUS | WLFC | CNTM | ATI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 32 | 85 | 60 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 63 (highest) | 48 | 36 | 1 |
| Returns on capital | 34 | 0 | — | 47 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 36 | 0 | 28 | 42 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 43 | 77 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 558% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported | $903M | $26.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |