The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
HWNI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GOGO · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | LILA | GAME | HWNI | GOGO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 57 (highest) | 33 | 55 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 38 | 27 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 52 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 28 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 50% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.5B | $35.1M | $163014 | $512M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 |