The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LOPE · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CTAS · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

LGCY · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CMG · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureLOPECTASLGCYCMG
Moat Score (0–100)8991 (highest)9089
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend8499100 (highest)65
Pricing power—77——
Returns on capital100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)97
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)91100 (highest)100 (highest)
Capital allocation73906095 (highest)
84% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)380% above value if growth stopped today87% above value if growth stopped today185% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$4.4B$85.5B$131M$38.9B
Moat tierWide moatWide moatWide moatWide moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2026FY2025