The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OXM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | LOW | BWMN | KRMN | OXM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 39 | 95 (highest) | 85 | 53 |
| Pricing power | 58 | 84 | 64 | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 0 | 91 | 68 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 57 | 83 (highest) | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 84 (highest) | 80 | 44 | 64 |
| 39% above value if growth stopped today | 427% above value if growth stopped today | 1792% above value if growth stopped today | 59% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $108.0B | $730M | $4.7B | $427M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |