The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LXFR · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CBUS · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AESI · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

COPR · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureLXFRCBUSAESICOPR
Moat Score (0–100)3435 (highest)35 (highest)34
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend362050 (highest)
Pricing power33543486 (highest)
Returns on capital24043 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety57 (highest)55228
Capital allocation2144 (highest)44 (highest)24
122% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data123% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$454MNot reported$1.5B$36.7M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026