The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

LYV · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SPOK · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WMG · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ADEA · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureLYVSPOKWMGADEA
Moat Score (0–100)5456 (highest)5554
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend65 (highest)4961
Pricing power100 (highest)80
Returns on capital40457 (highest)55
Balance-sheet safety52100 (highest)1441
Capital allocation602769 (highest)59
657% above value if growth stopped today24% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data61% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$41.7B$218MNot reported$2.8B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025