The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LEG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MATV | MBC | LEG | CODI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 | 26 (highest) | 25 | 25 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 (highest) | 28 | 10 | 44 |
| Pricing power | 20 | 48 | 30 | 58 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 27 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 3 | 37 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 21 | 25 (highest) | 24 |
| Around the value if growth stopped today | 41% below value if growth stopped today | 54% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $444M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $755M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |