The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
APHD · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LEG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MBC | DSS | APHD | LEG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 25 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 28 | 31 (highest) | — | 10 |
| Pricing power | 48 | 19 | 50 (highest) | 30 |
| Returns on capital | 27 (highest) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 3 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 37 |
| Capital allocation | 21 | 24 | 24 | 25 (highest) |
| 41% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 54% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.1B | $5M | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 |