The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
IBEX · Technology · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | META | FTNT | IBEX | MSFT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 98 | 100 (highest) | 99 | 97 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 100 (highest) | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 99 |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 87 |
| 292% above value if growth stopped today | 889% above value if growth stopped today | 31% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 274% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.71T | $126.2B | $535M | $3.67T |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |