The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WYNN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BIAF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MG | WYNN | GO | BIAF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 73 | 75 (highest) | 60 | 57 |
| Pricing power | 49 | — | 54 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 17 (highest) | 6 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 45 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | 120% above value if growth stopped today | 85% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $8.0B | $1.3B | $17.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |