The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KAVL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MHK | SMP | SFIX | KAVL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 28 | 52 (highest) | 20 | 27 |
| Pricing power | 39 | 52 | 76 (highest) | 8 |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 49 | 4 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 86 (highest) | 14 | 55 | — |
| Capital allocation | 37 | 34 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | 66% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $856M | $461M | $255055 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |