The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GDDY · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MMS | MGNI | ACIW | GDDY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 71 | 75 | 88 (highest) | 56 |
| Pricing power | 38 | 82 | 84 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 72 (highest) | 4 | 8 | 46 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 39 | 62 (highest) | 44 | 39 |
| Capital allocation | 81 | 80 | 77 | 100 (highest) |
| Around the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 474% above value if growth stopped today | 89% above value if growth stopped today | 34% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $3.3B | $3.5B | $5.4B | $14.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |