The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FFLO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | MNRO | ELVG | BARK | FFLO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 65 (highest) | 25 | — |
| Pricing power | 60 | 70 | 99 (highest) | 63 |
| Returns on capital | 13 (highest) | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 86 (highest) | 55 | 55 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 36 | 24 | 44 | 60 (highest) |
| 41% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | 45% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $504M | $5.2M | $73.9M | $2.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |